Wednesday, January 29, 2014

गांधी: कार्य आणि दृष्टीकोनाची चर्चा



गांधींचे जीवन आणि विचार या विषयी नव्याने मत व्यक्त करण्याचा प्रयत्न करणे म्हणजे केवळ अट्टाहासापोटी चाकाचा नव्याने शोध लावण्याचा उपद्व्याप करणे होय. भारतीय स्वातंत्र्य संग्रामाच्या केंद्रस्थानी राहण्याचा मान केवळ गांधींनाच मिळाल्याने, किव्हा तो टिकवून ठेवणे फक्त त्यांनाच जमल्याने, स्वातंत्र्यानंतर देखील त्यांची मुल्ये, पद्धती आणि कृती सातत्याने चर्चेत राहिली आहे. भारत म्हणजे गांधींचा देश हे समीकरण देखील जागतिक स्तरावर रूढ झाले आहे.
गांधींवर त्यांच्या हयातीत आणि नंतर ३ प्रकारची व्यापक टीका झाली आहे. काही विशिष्ट विचारसरणीच्या संघटनांना महत्वाच्या वाटणाऱ्या मुद्द्यांकडे गांधींनी केलेले दुर्लक्ष किव्हा तडजोडी हा या पैकी पहिला प्रकार आहे. यामध्ये, शेतमजूर व कामगारांच्या हितांकडे गांधींनी कानडोळा केल्याचा आरोप साम्यवाद्यांनी नेहमीच केला होता. दुसरीकडे, हिंदू महासभा आदी हिंदुत्ववादी संघटनांचा गांधींवरील राग हा त्यांनी हिंदू हितांशी तडजोड केली या समजुतीतून होता. या प्रकारच्या टीकेतून एक बाब स्पष्ट होते की गांधींच्या कार्यकाळात सर्व प्रकारच्या विचारसरणीच्या लोकांच्या त्यांच्याकडून अपेक्षा होत्या. या संघटनांनी हे गृहीत धरलेले होते की त्यांना अपेक्षित प्रश्नांवर जनजागृती करणे आणि लोक-आंदोलनाच्या माध्यमातून सरकारवर/प्रस्थापितांवर दबाव निर्माण करणे ही गांधींचीच जबाबदारी आहे. किंबहुना ही, गांधीनी ज्याप्रकारे जनमानसाची नाडी पकडली आहे तसे करणे आपणास जमणार नाही, याची इतरांनी दिलेली अप्रत्यक्ष कबुली होती. त्यामुळे समांतर राष्ट्रीय आंदोलन उभारण्याऐवजी गांधींवर दबाव टाकून आपले मुद्दे मार्गी लावावेत हा सोपा मार्ग त्यांनी पत्करला होता. गांधींवर होणारी दुसऱ्या प्रकारची टीका म्हणजे ‘स्वत: घोषित केलेल्या उद्दिष्टांबाबतही त्यांनी नेहमीच तडजोडीचे मार्ग स्विकारले’ ही आहे. असहकार आंदोलन तसेच कायदाभंग आंदोलन मागे घेतांना सरकारकडून अपेक्षित ते झोळीत पाडून घेण्यात आले नाही, अशा प्रकारची टीका त्यांच्यावर नेहमीच होते. यात बऱ्याच अंशी सत्य असले तरी प्रत्येक लढाईकडे अंतिम युद्धाच्या भूमिकेतून बघितले जाण्यातून ही टीका उद्भवली आहे. संघटना उभारणी आणि आंदोलनांच्या माध्यमातून राजकीय विस्तार करत असतांना कुठवर ताणायचे याचे भान सेनापतीला नेहमीच ठेवावे लागते. आंदोलन लवकर मागे घेतले गेल्यास ते नव्याने उभारता येते पण आंदोलन भरकटल्यास किव्हा सरकारी-यंत्रणेमार्फत संघटनेचे संपूर्ण दमन झाल्यास ते पुन्हा उभारणे अशक्यप्राय काम असते याची गांधींना जाणीव होती. १८५७ च्या अपयशी ठरलेल्या स्वातंत्र्य-लढ्यातून मिळालेल्या अनेक धड्यांपैकी हाही एक धडा होता. गांधींवर होणारी तिसऱ्या प्रकारची टीका ही त्यांच्या मूळ विचारसरणीवर होणारी, म्हणजेच वैचारिक टिका आहे. याबाबतीत गांधींना चहूबाजूंनी विविध प्रकारच्या व वेगवेगळ्या वैचारिक बांधिलकीच्या टिकांना सामोरे जावे लागले. गांधींची विचारसरणी व कार्यपद्धती दलितांच्या समानतेच्या आंदोलनाविरुद्ध जाणारी असल्याची भूमिका डॉ. आंबेडकरांनी सातत्याने घेतली. डॉ. आंबेडकर हे असे एकमेव व्यक्तीमत्व होते ज्यांनी स्वातंत्र्य आंदोलनाच्या काळात कॉंग्रेस व गांधींकडून काहीही अपेक्षा ठेवल्या नाहीत आणि महत्वाच्या वाटणाऱ्या प्रश्नांवर स्वत: जीवाचे रान केले. गांधींनी साम्राज्यवादविरोधी आणि भांडवलशाही विरोधी भूमिका घेतली असली तरी समाजवादाचे समर्थन त्यांनी केले नाही, याबद्दल साम्यवाद्यांनी त्यांना टीकेचे लक्ष केले. हिंदुत्ववाद्यांना गांधीजींची सर्वधर्मसमभावाची संकल्पना पटली नाही तर मुस्लिम कट्टरपंथ्यांनी त्यांना केवळ ‘हिंदूंचा नेता’ म्हणून जाहिर केले.
अनेक वैचारिक विरोधक असतांना सुद्धा गांधींनी स्वातंत्र्य आंदोलनाचे केंद्रस्थान पटकावले कारण त्यांनी आंदोलनात कृतीशील कार्यक्रमातून जनतेचा सहभाग निर्माण करण्यात यश मिळवले होते. दक्षिण आफ्रिकेतून परत येण्यापूर्वी भारतात विविध ठिकाणी सुरु असलेल्या वैचारिक मंथनाची त्यांना पूर्ण कल्पना होती. सर्वप्रथम, गांधींनी आधी सामाजिक सुधारणा की राजकीय स्वातंत्र्य हा वाद त्या वादात न पडताच मिटवून टाकला. एकाच राष्ट्रीय आंदोलनाच्या माध्यमातून दोन्ही उद्दिष्टे साध्य करण्यासाठी त्यांनी वेगवेगळ्या वेळी वेगवेगळे कार्यक्रम दिले होते. राजाराम मोहन रॉय, केशवचंद्र सेन, न्यायमूर्ती रानडे इत्यादींनी रुजवलेल्या सामाजिक सुधारणांच्या मुद्द्यांना त्यांनी राष्ट्रीय आंदोलनाचा अभिन्न भाग बनवले. गांधींच्या नेतृत्वावरील विश्वासामुळे स्वातंत्र्य आंदोलनातील महिलांचा सहभाग ‘न भूतो न भविष्यती’ असाच होता. ज्योतिबा फुलेंनी सामाजिक पटलावर आणलेल्या विषमतेच्या मुद्यांची आणि डॉ. आंबेडकरांमुळे दलित समाजात येत असलेल्या जागृतीची गांधींना जाणीव होती. त्यामुळेच त्यांनी सामाजिक सुधारणांच्या आंदोलनात स्पृश्यास्पृश्यता मिटवण्यास सर्वाधिक प्राधान्य दिले. गांधींनी केलेल्या या कामाची फळे स्वातंत्र्यानंतर पुढे कित्येक वर्षे कॉंग्रेस पक्षाने दलितांच्या मताच्या रूपाने चाखली.
कॉंग्रेसच्या सुरुवातीच्या काळातील मवाळ गट व जहाल गटातील कार्यपद्धती संबंधीचे मतभेद त्यांनी सत्याग्रहाच्या माध्यमातून संपवले. कॉंग्रेस विरुद्ध इतर गटांमध्ये, सत्याग्रह की सशस्त्र लढा हा वाद शेवटपर्यंत सुरु होता पण गांधींच्या आंदोलनातील जनसहभागाने सशस्त्र लढ्याचे समर्थक संख्येने नेहमी तुरळकच राहिलेत. आर्थिक मागण्यांच्या छोट्या-छोट्या ठिकाणी केलेल्या आंदोलनातून स्वातंत्र्याचे मोठे राष्ट्रीय आंदोलन उभारण्याची किमया त्यांनी सध्या केली. चंपारणचा सत्याग्रह, खेडा सत्याग्रह, अहमदाबादच्या गिरण्यातील कामगारांचा संप, मीठावर लादलेल्या कराविरुद्धची दांडीयात्रा या सर्व आंदोलनांमध्ये जनसामान्यांच्या आर्थिक हलाखीला साद घालण्यात आली होती. त्याचप्रमाणे, भारतीय अर्थव्यवस्थेतील खेड्यांचे स्थान आणि शेतीचे महत्व यांना राष्ट्रीय आंदोलनाच्या केंद्रस्थानी आणण्याचे संपूर्ण श्रेय गांधींना जाते.
हिंदू-मुस्लिम प्रश्नाची तीव्रता आणि परिणामांबाबत गांधी सुरुवातीपासून चौकस होते. सन १९१६ मध्ये, लोकमान्य टिळक यांनी लखनौ इथे कॉंग्रेस व मुस्लिम लिग दरम्यान मुस्लिमांना स्वतंत्र मतदारसंघ देण्याचा करार घडवून आणण्याच्या पार्श्वभूमीवर भारतीय राजकारणात गांधींचे आगमन झाले होते. साहजिकच त्यांनी सुरुवातीपासून हिंदू-मुस्लिम ऐक्याच्या आवश्यकतेवर जोर दिला. मात्र इतर बाबतीत जेवढे यश गांधींना मिळाले तेवढे हिंदू-मुस्लिमांमध्ये सामंजस्य निर्माण करण्यात मिळाले नाही. असे असले तरी या प्रश्नाला हात लावण्याचे त्यांनी टाळले नाही. उलट आयुष्यातील शेवटच्या काळात त्यांनी सर्वाधिक प्रयत्न वेळ हिंदू-मुस्लिमांमध्ये सामंजस्य निर्माण करण्यासाठी केले. त्यांच्या प्रयत्नांनी फाळणी थांबली नाही पण स्वतंत्र भारताची पायाभरणी एक धर्मनिरपेक्ष लोकशाही देश म्हणून झाली. सामाजिक जीवनात सर्वधर्मसमभाव आणि सरकारचा धर्मनिरपेक्ष दृष्टीकोन या मुल्यांची जोपासना न केल्यास भारताचे आणखी तुकडे पडतील हे गांधींनी ओळखले होते आणि जनमानसावर तसे बिंबवले होते.
गांधींचे महात्म याच्यात होते की त्यांनी विविध विचारसरणीशी सतत संवाद सुरु ठेवला. इतरांनी त्यांच्याकडून काही शिकले नाही तरी ते सर्वांकडून शिकत गेलेत. परिणामी, गांधी हयातीत असे पर्यंत इतर सर्व त्यांच्या पुढे खुजे ठरलेत. गांधींच्या अनुषंगाने भारतीय समाजात चाललेल्या विचार-युद्धात भारतीय लोकशाहीची बीजे पेरल्या गेली होती. घटना-सभेतील प्रदीर्घ चर्चांमधून भारतीय राज्यघटनेत याचे प्रतिबिंब उमटले आहे.

Thursday, January 16, 2014

10 Mistakes Committed by Congress



In May 2009, the entire media was celebrating United Progressive Alliance’s (UPA) victory in the Lok Sabha election and was busy in predicting Congress majority in 2014 with Rahul Gandhi as party’s Prime Ministerial candidate. Within a span of four and half years, there is a 360 degree turn in media’s sentiments. However, media is only an indicator of the public mood in general, if not in specific. The Congress was buoyant in 2009 with whopping 206 seats in its kitty while the principal opposition, Bhartiya Janata Party was in disarray and the principle opposition – the Left in complete shambles. Since 2009, neither the Left has rediscovered its role nor the BJP was quick to put its house in order. Yet, everything went against the Congress interest while its leadership displayed supreme arrogance towards parliamentary opposition and movements on the street under the pretext that neither of them have any ‘electoral democratic’ legitimacy. Following are the 10 things where Congress committed mistakes and is now bleeding with the unprecedented electoral defeats.
1.       Inertia in its Foreign Policy: The 2009 election took place in the background of 2 prominent foreign policy issues. One was Indo-US nuclear deal and the other was Pakistan’s role in 26/11. The people were convinced that under Dr. Manmohan Singh’s leadership country’s foreign policy has obtained a direction and decisiveness. However, in last 4 and half years there is hardly any forward movement in country’s foreign policy. The Indo-US relations have not moved ahead after the operationalization of the nuclear deal and Indo-Pak relations are rotting at the same place since 2009. India’s policy with its neighbours is in the doldrums with New Delhi losing out inch by inch on each occasion. UPA-2 has lost the glorious opportunity to build up on the friendly ties with Bangla Desh and gain a solid ally in the region. In the process, UPA-2 has also lost out Mamata Banerjee who had sabotaged the Teesta Water agreement with Dhaka. Similarly, Indian government wanted to keep the Tamil parties happy on the issue of human rights violations in Sri Lanka. However, it has made the Lankan government unhappy and all of the Tamil parties in Tamil Nadu have drifted away from UPA-2. With regard to taking forward the peace process with Pakistan, Dr. Manmohan Singh was always under the shadow of feared right-wing onslaught and hence did not show the courage. This has not stopped the re-ascendency of the right wing BJP at the national level but even the liberal critics are pointing out that Atal Bihari Vajpeyee was more forthcoming, bold and innovative on Kashmir as well as on relations with Pakistan. UPA-2 government’s non-committal attitude is uninspiring for the aspirational Indians and has given out the impression of a weak central government. This is a tragedy number 1 which could have been easily avoided with a focussed and determined leadership of the MEA.        
2.       Flip-Flop on Ramdev: It is still a mystery why did team of cabinet ministers received Ramdev at Delhi airport when he arrived to launch agitation against the UPA government. The same ministers indulged in a prolonged dialogue with him. However, the love got lost between them and the UPA government forcefully removed Ramdev and his supporters from the Ram Lila maidan. These flip-flops indicated government’s inability to take firm decisions, adding to overall perception of misgovernment and indecisiveness.
3.       Misreading of the Public Mood: Congress could not grasp the intensity of people’s anger after the 16th December, 2012 Nirbhaya case. It was unnecessarily on the defensive wherein it should have asked its local leaders and cadres to mobilize people and participate in expressing anger against the misdeed. However, it was a classic case of an establishment losing touch with the subjects. Post-Nirbhaya case, Congress has done little to project its young women leadership neither has it done anything concrete to showcase its concern over women’s safety and dignity.   
4.       Mismanagement with the Allies: Congress lost its strongest ally, Trinamul Congress for no reasons. It was a sheer mismanagement of relations from the side of Congress managers. In fact, no one seems to be in charge of managing the allies in Congress party. In Tamil Nadu, the Congress is without allies now. In both these states, Congress is a marginal player and going into Lok Sabha election without allies means losing out even before the start of the race. West Bengal and Tamil Nadu-Puduchery contribute respectively 42 and 40 seats to the Lok Sabha tally. At the other end, UPA government walked an extra mile to help out Lalu Prasad Yadav when it brought out an ordinance nullifying Supreme Court decision on tainted representatives. It neither helped Congress in terms of securing any benefits in Bihar nor at the national level. On the contrary, the ordinance and turn about on it became a matter of major embarrassment for the party before important assembly elections in 5 states.  
5.       Inability to Remove Tainted Leaders: Congress leadership showed lots of reluctance in taking action against tainted leaders. As result, the actions taken by it were seen as compulsions and happened due to pressures from opposition parties and people in general. This gave the impression that leaving to itself, Congress would not initiate action against its tainted leaders. Congress leadership wasted almost a full session of parliament but did not accept opposition’s demand to remove Pawan Bansal and Ashwini Kumar from the Union Cabinet. However, once parliament session is over, it sacked them from the ministry. Similarly, much maligned Suresh Kalmadi was not removed from his official positions neither been sacked from the party for a long, which has dented the party’s anti-corruption credibility beyond repair. Moreover, Congress was quick to reinstate the sacked leaders at the first opportunity. Shashi Tharur is back in the Union Ministry so as Ashwini Kumar was allocated a Cabinet level position as Prime Minister’s Special Envoy to Japan. Abhishek Manu Singhavi who was removed as party spokesperson over his alleged sexual misconduct is back in the same position while Narayan Datt Tiwari is still in the Congress Party. These developments have convincingly given impression that Congress is not at all serious about removing corruption and upholding personal probity in public life. In fact, Congress was under the misperception that public memory is quite short, which, in deed, is not!
6.       Mishandling of State Situations: Congress was able to cross the 200 mark in the Lok Sabha mainly because of its best performances in states of Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi and Uttarakhand. These 5 states have sent more than 80 Congress MPs to Lok Sabha in 2009. However, the party has lost credibility in all of these states one by one. In Uttarakhand, Congress won all 5 Lok Sabha seats and in the subsequent assembly election dislodged BJP government in the state. However, in selecting its Chief Minister the party has given weightage to Darbar credentials and ignored the leaders with wide network and mass appeal. Anointment of Vijaya Bahuguna as leader of CLP ignoring strong claims of Harish Rawat has not gone down well with the activists and people alike. In Delhi, it has given free hand to Sheila Dixit who misread and mishandled each and every crisis. Now, Congress is weeping with blood over Delhi assembly results and its kitty of 7 Lok Sabha MPs from the city-state is also in grave danger. In Rajasthan, Ashok Gehlot administration slept for well over 3 years and started doling out sops only at the fag end of its tenure. Congress had the golden opportunity to strengthen its organizational hold in the state as BJP was marred with infighting for most of the period. However, the laid back attitude of the Congress has led the party to a situation wherein it has to fight to save at least 4-5 Lok Sabha seats in the state out of the odd 20 that it won in 2009. In Uttar Pradesh, Congress surprised everyone, or might be it also got surprised, as it won 22 Lok Sabha seats and emerged as number 1 party in the 2009 Lok Sabha election. All credit to this unexpected victory was given to Rahul Gandhi and it was expected that he would lead the party to a spectacular come back in the assembly election. But that was not to happen, thanks to gross misreading of social equations in the state. An under-graduate student of Indian politics too knows it very well that Dalits in U.P. will not ditch Mayawati, particularly for the Congress party. Yet, Rahul Gandhi’s entire emphasis was to build an alliance of Dalit, OBCs and Muslims in the state. He has failed to understand the ground dynamics of tensions between OBCs and Dalits that have drifted Mulayam and Mayawati forever from each other. As a result, OBCs did not turn up to the grand old party and Dalits were not at all interested in voting for anyone than BSP. As Muslims could see that Congress was not able to build a cohesive social alliance, it voted for Samajwadi Party almost en mass. The constituency to grab in the U.P. was Brahmins and then to build a Brahmin-Muslim alliance. This could have been a beginning of party’s resurgence in India’s largest state. Now, it is struggling to come up with a strategy to secure at least half of the Lok Sabha seats that it won in 2009. Andhra Pradesh tops the list of Congress misdeeds and misreading in last four and half years. After the accidental death of its popular leader YSR Reddy, it failed to judge the support for his son Jagan Reddy among people as well as in the organization. After rejecting his claim over Chief Ministership, the high command selected such a person for the top position who has not only become completely irrelevant today but no one even remembers his name outside his home state. Congress lost the opportunity to take a high moral ground that it is not encouraging dynasty politics. Then, UPA government made all of its flip-flops over Telengana which has jeopardized the entire state’s administration. Congress is now in the fight on only 17 seats in Telengana, just half of the number it won in 2009. All such developments have taken out shine from Congress leadership and resulted in loss of credibility of its leaders.
7.       Mysterious Rahul: Rahul Gandhi should have become a minister in the UPA-2 government. This would give him a platform to showcase his administrative abilities, implementation of programmes and visionary initiatives, if any. However, his constant refusal on non-participation gave way to the impression that he has been avoiding responsibilities. His elevation as party Vice-President when he did not have much to show case sent out a wrong signal outside the party. It meant that power would be concentrated in the Nehru-Gandhi family for another 2 to 4 decades at least. Moreover, silence on prime ministerial candidate but all indications towards Rahul Gandhi by the Congress leaders literally meant that in the future he would be no. 1 in the government as well as in the party. This was un-inspirational not only for the common people but also for the Congress workers. Message to the country at large was that Rahul must be crowned as a supreme leader only because of his virtue of born in the Nehru-Gandhi family. At this juncture, this is not acceptable to the people.     
8.       Directionless Economy: UPA-2 government failed to build up on the momentum created during its first term as a result of mixure of economic reforms and welfare schemes. Government’s 3 most flaunted initiatives, i.e. allowing FDI in Retail, Food Security Act and Land Acquisition Act failed to generate any kind of enthusiasm and optimism. The FDI in retail was resented by the traders and shop-keepers while Congress could not garner support of intended beneficiaries of proposed policies, i.e. the service sector oriented middle class and farmers. The food security act was welcomed by the wide spectrum of the political parties, however, there is nothing much that the poor would get from this act except the right to knock the doors of the judiciary for denial of food security. Almost all the state governments are already running various food schemes for the poor, therefore, the new act added value to it on the paper but not much would change for the poor on the ground. Moreover, the complete implementation of the Food Security Act can become reality only after the upcoming general election. Just like this act, the Land Acquisition Act was enacted too late giving the impression that Congress is doing all these only to get votes on the promise that the Acts would be implemented only if it returns to power. Its other schemes such as Direct Cash Transfer etc have not seen light of the day in most of the states. 
9.       Grand Fall of Brand Manmohan: The honest politician, Dr. Manmohan Singh’s silences over many crucial issues or his non-initiatives to resolve deadlock with the opposition have not gone down well with the public. On the top of it, what destroyed Prime Minister’s grand standing was his often emphasizing on compulsions of coalition politics. The people have seen that Dr. Singh did not care about coalitions or consensus when it came to pushing his favorite policies such as FDI in retail on nuclear deal but lamented about coalition politics when it comes to curbing the corruption. Dr. Singh’s failure to reign in ministers like D. Raja or his reluctance to constitute JPC to probe 2-G scams presented him as a puppet in the hands of Nehru-Gandhi family rather than a man with moral values.
10.   Dilly-dallying tactics on Lokpal Bill: It was a matter of principle! If you accept that institution of Lokpal is necessary to curb the corruption, create the institution with the mandate at your hand. The other position would have been that Lokpal is a misconstrued concept which would not curtail the scams at the higher level. However, neither Congress nor any other political party has taken this stand. Thus, the onus was on the ruling coalition to enact the legislation at the earliest, particularly after the massive movement that took place for it. However, for most of the time Congress paid only a lip service to the Lokpal bill and impression gathered by the people was that it was effectively using allies like RJD and SP to scuttle the enactment of Lokpal Law. Moreover, Congress led the political parties’ onslaught against the movement for Lokpal under the pretext that the movement or the leaders of the movement do not carry people’s mandate with them. More importantly, thrust of its argument was that only election could be considered as the legitimate means of expressing people’s interest in the democracy and agitations et al have been detrimental to the health of democracy. This position was a rape of the democracy and people have given capital punishment to the party for committing this sin. After Aam Adami Party’s breakthrough performance in the Delhi assembly election, the ruling UPA and main opposition, BJP had shown alarming haste in passing the Lokpal Bill in the Parliament. But its too late now!
All together, these 10 mistakes are costing a lot to the grand old party. First of all, it has given space to Narendra Modi in national politics. Secondly, it has helped in building credibility of Aam Aadmi Party. As a result, Congress is facing its third crisis of survival in post-Indira Gandhi phase. The first phase was between 1989-91 when it was challenged by V.P. Singh’s politics on one hand and Sangh Parivar’s politics on the other hand. The second phase started immediately after Rajiv Gandhi’s death in 1991 but got accentuated post-1996 after the loss of power at the centre. This phase lasted for almost 8 years, i.e. from 1996 to 2004. While the first phase gave rise to regional caste based parties in north India and BJP at the national level, the second phase has consolidated the position of caste based regional parties and BJP. Now, in the third phase of crisis for the Congress, rise of the Aam Aadmi Party is an imminent fact. However, the AAP threatens not only the Congress but also the caste-based regional parties and dented Narendra Modi-led BJP’s credibility as the clean and only alternative in Indian politics. In the short run, Congress will be at the receiving end of the AAP’s popularity. In the long run, all the established political parties will suffer at the hands of the AAP. This process was bound to happen but only got aggravated due to the mistakes committed by Congress during UPA-2 rule.