Showing posts with label bjp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bjp. Show all posts

Monday, May 30, 2016

Rahul Gandhi’s Party


Knifes are out against Rahul Gandhi. Yet again, from the non-Congressmen! True to their style and habit, the RSS ideologues are making fun of Rahul’s leadership ‘qualities’. Opponent’s character assassination and his/her devaluation through a non-political discourse are distinct ways of right-wing politics in India. Nonetheless, the questions raised on Rahul’s abilities to win the elections for his party are valid and pressing for the Congress. While everyone is crying that he needs to take some drastic measures, no one is suggesting what exactly he should do. In this context, it is important to understand in the first place what Rahul is doing. At least, what he really wants to do! If we dissect Rahul’s focus and activities over the last few years, following themes emerged out of it. First, he wants to change the Congress style of functioning thoroughly bringing into it professionalism. Second, he is passionate about reconnecting the party with dalit, minority and tribal population in the country. Third, he prefers fighting elections in alliances with anti-BJP parties. This three point formula is sufficiently potent to ensure Congress’ electoral victories only if it works in tandem.
As it is obvious now, the formula is dysfunctional at pan-India level. There could be two reasons behind it. First, Rahul Gandhi is not putting up the amount of effort required for the success of his formula. Second, the Congress leaders - from CWC to the district level - have not imbibed within them the spirit that Rahul is trying to inject in the Congress party. In practice, the failure is a combination of both the reasons. If there is a criticism that Rahul is not consistent in his efforts, he must take it in right strides. There is always a scope for doing more in politics, more so for the almost moribund Congress party. On the other hand, the Congressmen need to follow their leader by example. Why it is a case that even after Rahul Gandhi’s famous Niyamgiri climb, no Congress leader of the worth has dedicated himself to the cause in Odisha? As a Congress worker in Pune recently said, “When Rahul undertook a padayatra in Maharashtra last year, many state Congress leaders followed him; but in their SUVs.” In a nutshell, Rahul’s vision for Congress does not match with his party-men’s mission for themselves. They want him to fetch votes of underprivileged sections but do not strive to champion their cause. Hence, they celebrate his overnight stays in dalit homes in Uttar Pradesh but never do it on their own. Contrast it with Mahatma Gandhi and his followers during the freedom struggle and one realizes why that old man stand out as the master tactician of all times. Rahul’s singular failure is his inability to bring on board his party men during the struggles.  This has led to a joke in a non-BJP non-Congress sections that he would end up being a Maoist, fighting alone for the cause of the oppressed. 
A student from Hyderabad has recently written following message on facebook in response to RSS onslaught on Rahul through media, "I remember Rahul Gandhi at the University of Hyderabad how he interacted with the agitating students there after Rohith Vemula was killed. He was humble. He was submissive. Sitting at the shopcom in a day-long relay hunger strike for almost 18 hours he didn't look tired. There was a sign of some helplessness on his face. The local leaders were kept away. I didn't find him 'pappu'. Though he is brief and not 'charismatic' in his speeches, he has a sharp content in them. I haven't seen anyone in Congress other than him and Sonia Gandhi dare to attack RSS profoundly. We all can have differences with him and his party but we cannot ignore his solidarity with the students of FTII, HCU and JNU in recent times.” Rahul’s day out in Hyderabad Central University was enough for the Congress student and youth wing to hit the streets across India. Something that did not happen at all. Rahul Gandhi is not on a wrong track but his party is unable to comprehend his objective.
There are two more features of Rahul’s approach in politics, which he has inherited from his mother. First, he respects the elders in the party and does not wish to hurt them. Second, he does not interfere in the functioning of Congress state units or Congress led governments in the states. While both the points are praiseworthy, they do not help in winning elections. Like RSS micro-management of BJP in each state, Rahul Gandhi needs to develop incisiveness to ask questions and demand accountability from state leaders – irrespective of their age and experience. In this respect, he must learn from his grand-mother, late Indira Gandhi, on how she was respected and feared alike by all the Congressmen across the states. (Written on 20th May 2016)       

Thursday, March 15, 2012

On Proportional Representation

In recently declared assembly election results of Uttar Pradesh, asymmetry between voting percentage and number of seats won has once again demonstrated short- falls of first past the post system, and generated a debate among section of intellectuals on switching to system of proportional representation. The stark contrast between vote percentage and seats garnered is a common phenomenon in post-independent India and people have always accepted results based on this system. At least, any grievances towards this system has not been manifested anywhere through people’s/organization’s actions. In this context, it is worth asking, how desirable it is to indulge in this debate when there is no such demand from people or section of people. Proportional representation, in Indian context, could prove to be more disastrous than the first past the post system for various reasons.
First, it could be a recipe for permanent political instability as no party would get majority on its own, for sure. But, isn’t it already the case at the Centre since 1989? Then, in the proportional representation, system could be designed in such a way that top two parties in each state would be benefitted with majority of the seats, while parties with little percentage of votes would not earn anything. Unless a party wins more than 6 or 8 percentage of votes in a state, it won’t be awarded with a seat. Such system does exist in many countries that have opted for proportional representation. However, isn’t it against the very principle of fair representation to all for which the said switchover is being advocated?
Second, the proportional representation system, in a country like India, may further divide the society on caste and communal lines with party formations and organizations taking place entirely on caste and communal orders. It is true that existing system has failed to adequately represent people from across the communities for fairly long time. But, the trends in last 20 years indicate that, even without reservations, numerically vast but socially marginalized communities like the OBCs, have substantially increased their representation at state and national level. In Uttar Pradesh, Muslim representation is also on the rise in the state assembly. So, what is the need for switchover? On the contrary, presently the mainstream political parties, Congress, BJP and the Left, is constantly under pressure to provide fair representation in their party organizations and seat distribution to socially marginalized sections. This pressure might be diluted once party list-based representation comes into play.
Third, and in continuation of the earlier point, all the major parties are poised between people gaining position due to their closeness to their respective high-commands and people have mass support in their constituencies. The proportional representation will shift this balance entirely against the latter. This implies to all political formations ranging from the Left to BSP to Congress to BJP. How desirous this would be?
Fourth, if switchover is in discussion, feasibility of adopting any of the other electoral systems would rightly come into discussion. For example, the preferential voting system. It would be an elite perception to think that ordinary, and illiterate, people won’t understand the preferential voting system. So, any arguments against, and for, preferential voting system should go beyond this point.